Expanded I-601A Provisional Waiver Lawyers in San Jose
The Obama Administration on July 22, 2016 published a final rule expanding
I-601A provisional unlawful presence waivers for individuals inadmissible
for unlawful presence under INA 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I), (II). The new I-601A
rule amending 8 CFR 212.7(e) can be found at 81 Fed. Reg. 50244 (Jul.
This new rule, effective August 29, 2016, builds on DHS’s 2013 provisional
waiver regulations. Under the 2013 Rules, immigrant visa (IV) applicants
in the U.S. with six months or one year of disqualifying unlawful presence
could for the first time seek an extreme hardship inadmissibility waiver
prior to departing abroad for consular processing.
Before implementation of the 2013 Rule, waiver applicants could expect
to wait at least six months abroad while awaiting a decision on an unlawful
presence waiver. Now that immigrant applicants can submit their waiver
before going abroad for their visa interview, the I-601A process significantly
shortened separation from employment and family. With an approved provisional
waiver, visa processing times at the Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, consular post
typically takes approximately 1-2 weeks.
The 2016 Rule will expand the eligible pool of applicants in significant
ways. Most significantly, employers for the first time in a generation
- since 245(i) in December 2000 - will now have a meaningful opportunity
to petition for undocumented workers.
How Do I Qualify for the Expanded I-601A Stateside Provisional Waiver?
Previously, only family-based immigrant visa beneficiaries could seek a
provisional waiver. Now applicants under all visa categories may take
advantage of the provisional waiver process:
- I-130 Immediate relatives
- I-130 Preference-based family members
- I-140 Employment based immigrants
- Diversity “visa lottery” immigrants
- I-360 special immigrants
The eligible group of qualifying relatives for extreme hardship has also
been expanded. Previously, immigrant visa applicants could only establish
I-601A eligibility based on “extreme hardship” to a U.S. citizen
spouse or parent. Now, under the expanded regulations, I-601A applicants
may request a waiver based on hardship to both a spouse or parent who
is either a U.S. citizen or U.S. lawful permanent resident. The 2016 Rules
are a major step forward for undocumented individuals in the family based
categories married to permanent resident spouses. Thanks to the new rules,
these families can now pursue an I-601A waiver and minimize lengthy separation
from their jobs and families.
Can I Apply for the Expanded I-601A Waiver under an Employment Based Visa?
What could be overlooked in the new regulations is the critical inclusion
of employment based visa categories, a policy decision which will now
allow employers to petition for undocumented workers and thereby positively
reduce America’s undocumented population. Under current priority
dates, adult nationals of Mexico who are unmarried and unable to benefit
from a spouse petition must wait at least two decades to benefit from
a visa petition filed by a U.S. citizen or permanent resident parent.
Given the practically endless waiting period, the I-601A program holds
little meaningful hope of legalizing a non-citizen from Mexico in a reasonable
However, a national from Mexico need only wait about one year under the
current visa bulletin to benefit from a skilled worker petition filed
by an employer. That worker may then pursue an I-601A waiver instead of
the I-601 normal hardship waiver that would require the applicant to spend
months abroad causing hardship to himself, his employer, and his family.
Thanks to the expanded pool of qualifying relatives to include legal resident
and U.S. citizen spouses and parents, it appears immigrants with unlawful
presence issues, particularly nationals from Mexico, may now have a fighting
chance at U.S. residence.
The linchpin to all of this is the employer willing to file an employment-based
petition. As a result of I-601A expansion, the employment-based third
preference petition has emerged as the last best chance for many undocumented
Mexican nationals, many of whom have U.S. citizen or legal resident parents,
and many of whom are either unmarried, widowed or divorced, with no U.S.
citizen or legal resident spouse to petition for them. The 2016 Rules
mark a critical opportunity for undocumented workers to obtain legal resident
status in a reasonable period of time, and not a quarter century from now.
What if I'm Inadmissible for Something Else Besides Unlawful Presence?
Beyond the 2016 Rules’ eligibility expansion, the new I-601A regulations
have eliminated application of the “reason to believe” doctrine
for separate grounds of inadmissibility. The 2013 Rule prohibited issuance
of an I-601A waiver if USCIS found a “reason to believe” the
Applicant is inadmissible inter alia for health related grounds, fraud,
smuggling, false claim to U.S. citizenship, a crime involving moral turpitude
or controlled substance offense.
In the experience of many practitioners, these reason to believe findings
were erroneous and could be easily overcome at a consular interview. However,
the Applicant would have to proceed under the normal I-601 waiver process
after a consular interview, necessitating needless travel abroad and lengthy
separation from work and family. Under the 2016 Rule, USCIS will not undertake
a reason to believe analysis, but will instead permit the Applicant to
sort out these separate grounds of inadmissibility at the consular interview.
Be warned however: USCIS can still approve an I-601A waiver if DHS has
information that the Applicant is inadmissible for other reasons. This
could have catastrophic consequences at the immigrant visa interview,
because if the consular post determines the Applicant is inadmissible
for any other reason, USCIS will revoke the I-601A approval, and the consulate
will deny the visa application. If the Applicant is barred for conduct
that isn’t waivable, like (unlawful re-entry, drug crimes, smuggling
a friend into the U.S.) then the Applicant won’t have a way to return
legally to the United States.
Do I Qualify for an I-601A Waiver If I'm in the U.S. with a Removal
Order and Haven't Left?
The new regulations provide relief to Applicants who are under removal
order but are still in the U.S. Under the expanded rules, a non-citizen
may file an I-601A waiver upon favorable adjudication by USCIS of a stateside
I-212 waiver of a prior deportation order that hasn’t been executed.
When Can I Apply for the I-601A Stateside Provisional Waiver?
The new eligibility rules go into begins August 29, 2016. A Provisional
Waiver Application may be submitted only once USCIS has approved your
relative's I-130 or I-360 visa petition. After paying the immigrant
visa processing fee with the U.S. Department of State, the NVC should
be informed that you will be seeking a provisional waiver. The National
Visa Center will then put your visa interview on hold until the I-601A
How long does it take for USCIS to Approve the I-601A Stateside Provisional Waiver?
USCIS expects it to take three months to review the waiver.
How much does it cost to apply for the I-601A Stateside Provisional Waiver?
The current USCIS filing fee is $585, plus a biometrics (fingerprint) fee
of $85 for applicants 79 and younger.
Who May Not Qualify for the I-601A Stateside Provisional Waiver?
Applicants with pending removal proceedings do not qualify to file under
the provisional waiver program. There is an exception for non-citizens
with administratively closed cases whose cases have been taken off the
immigration court calendar. Once the waiver is granted, the immigration
court must terminate the deportation cases before the non-citizen departs
the United States for the immigrant visa interview.
Unfortunately, I-601A expansion does not solve "permanent bar"
inadmissibility. Non-citizens with more than one year of accrued unlawful
presence who have subsequently departed the U.S. and unlawfully returned,
or who have unlawfully returned after execution of a removal order, are
inadmissible for ten years, which must be spent outside the United States.
Inadmissibility for unlawful reentry is not subject to waiver.